IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1249 of 2025 ------ Rina Kumari, aged about 35 years, d/o late Rajeshwar Prasad, r/o Sector -3/B, House No. 219, P.O. & P.S.-B.S. City, Dist.- Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 21.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending her arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bokaro Steel City P.S. Case No.47 of 2019 (G.R. No. 800 of 2020) registered under sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the informant has sold his car to Deepak Kumar Srivastava who gave a cheque of Rs.6,00,000/- out of total consideration amount of Rs.8,24,536/- but the same was dishonoured and as after notice, the co-accused Deepak Kumar Srivastava did not pay the cheque amount, C/1 C.P. Case No. 975 of 2014 was instituted. It is then alleged that during the pendency of the case, the co-accused- Deepak Kumar Srivastava and the petitioner as well as other co- accused persons entered into a criminal conspiracy and return agreement was made in which the petitioner has also put her signature as a witness. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no allegation of any entrustment of money to the petitioner nor there is any allegation of any false document having been created by the petitioner or anyone else. It is then submitted that there is no allegation of impersonation against the petitioner and the petitioner is a female. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that she will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, she shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bokaro, in connection with Bokaro Steel City P.S. Case No.47 of 2019 (G.R. No. 800 of 2020) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that she will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-