SRI PRAMOD PRABHAKAR MANERIKAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/108069/2023 · 2025-09-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61595 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61595 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13331 WP No. 108069 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 108069 OF 2023 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN:
SRI. PRAMOD PRABHAKAR MANERIKAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS HIREDIATARY TRUSTEE/CHAIRMAN OF THE RAMALING DEV TRUST, ASOGA, TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT. OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT VIDHAN SOUDHA, BANGALORE.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MUJARAI DIVISION, BELAGAVI
4.
THE ZILLA DHARMIKA PARISHAT AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND CJHARITABLE ENDOWMENT OFFICE, COURT COMPOUND, BELAGAVI.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13331 WP No. 108069 of 2023
5.
SRI BASAPPA RAMA PUJARI AGE MAJOR, ARCHAKA, R/O ASOGA, TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, WHEREFORE, THE PETITIONER PRAYS THAT THIS COURT BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS AND ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO.
RD 87 MUAABI 2012, BANGALORE, DATED. 29/09/2012 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES PETITIONER TRUST AS PER ANNEXURE-N, AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND VIOLATION OF BYE-LAWS OF THE TRUST, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH, Ct-cmu List No.: 2 Sl No.: 61