Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6159 (PAT)

Rukhsar Parveen v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./48626/2025 · 2026-05-15

Praveen Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48626 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2020 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Rukhsar Parveen W/o Amjad Khan Resident of H No C 67, Gali No 3, Right E Block, Top Floor, Hardev Nagar, Jharoda Mazra, Burari, PO- Burari, PS- Wazirabad, District- North Delhi 2. Muskan @ Muskan Khatoon D/o Munna Ahmad Resident of H No C 67, Gali No 3, Right E Block, Top Floor, Hardev Nagar, Jharoda Mazra, Burari, PO- Burari, PS- Wazirabad, District- North Delhi 3. Rubina Praween D/o Munna Ahmad Resident of H No C 67, Gali No 3, Right E Block, Top Floor, Hardev Nagar, Jharoda Mazra, Burari, PO- Burari, PS- Wazirabad, District- North Delhi 4. Imran Imam S/o Md. Nezam R/o Dargah Chauraha, P.S.- Sultanganj, Mahendru, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Amzad Khan S/o Late Abdul Sattar Khan R/o Miyanpur, Silangahi, P.S.- Bairaiya, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhumay Madhup, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 15-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2. 2. This application has been filed for quashing of the FIR bearing Bairya P.S. Case No. 501 of 2020 dated 24.11.2020 registered for the offences against the petitioners under Sections 323, 341, 504, 406, 420, 120B and 384 of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48626 of 2025(3) dt.15-05-2026 2/2 3. It has been submitted that petitioners and Opposite Party No. 2 have compromised their case outside the Court and good sense has prevailed between the parties. It has further been submitted that parties have entered into compromise without threat, coercion or promise. It has further been submitted that the offences under Section 384 IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 are not compoundable. The dispute arose out of matrimonial discord. 4. In the interest of justice, since the parties have entered into compromise, the FIR bearing Bairya P.S. Case No. 501 of 2020 dated 24.11.2020, is hereby quashed. shivam/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T