BHAGABAN MOHAPATRA CONSTRUCTIONS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED REPRR THROUGH BIJAY BHARAT MOHAPATRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES CUM CHAIRMAN
WPC/742/2022 · 2025-08-12
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6159 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6159 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:23419
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.742 of 2022 ---- Bhagaban Mohapatra Constructions and Engineers Private Limited, represented through its Managing Director, Bijay Bharat Mohapatra, S/o Bhagaban Mohapatra, aged about 32 years, resident of HIG 27, Gourab Bihar, Madhuban, Paradeep, P.O + P.S and District- Jagatsinghpur
…. …. Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through Director of Industries-cum-Chairman, Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, P.O and P.S -Doranda, District-Ranchi.
2. Ladaco Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. represented through its Director Karnjeet Kumar Singh, S/o not known to the Petitioner, aged not known to the Petitioner, Resident of-Flat-517, M-Infinity, P.O.+P.S.-Dimna Road, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
3. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip represented through its Deputy General Manager, having its Office at P.O. and P.S-Jhimani, Via- Kujang, Dist- Jagatsinghpur, Odisha. …. …. Respondent(s) ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaustav Roy, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, A.C. to G.P.-II
Mr Avinash Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Harsh Chandra, Adv.
Mr. Avinash Agarwal, Adv.
----
04/Dated: 12th August, 2025
1. Present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
“a. For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction for setting aside the decision of MSEFC, Jharkhand dated 08.02.2022 (Annexure-7) in Case No. JHMSEFC- 32/2021 as the same has been given without going into the merits of the matter and is in violation of the law for the time being in force.
b. For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction for final disposal of the matter within a stipulated time frame after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to both the parties.
c. For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, including writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 2 to refrain from making payment of the claim
2025:JHHC:23419
Page | 2
W.P. (C) No.742 of 2022
amount in furtherance to the decision of MSEFC, Jharkhand from the Petitioner's final bill amount till the disposal of the proceedings before MSEFC Jharkhand.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous and, on instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
4. Permission is granted.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed as infructuous.
6. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded