1 2025:CGHC:60217 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12705 of 2025 • D.P. Singh (Dwarika Prasad Singh) S/o Late Sitaram Singh Aged About 74 Years Retired Upper Division Clerk, Thakur Chhedilal Government Post Graduate College, Janjgir, R/o. Kahrapara, Purani Basti, Ward No. 13, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Deptt. Of Higher Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Higher Secondary Education Department, Government Science Parisar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Janjgir-Champa District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - The Principal Thakur Chhedilal Government Post Graduate College, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Ankita Goswami, Advocate For State : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 11.12.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of direction to the respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 03.11.2024 regarding the interest amount. BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.12.12 10:45:18 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recovery to the tune of Rs. 3,12,594/- was made against the petitioner against which the petitioner has preferred petition bearing W.P.(S) No. 956 of 2012 wherein this Court vide order dated 25.07.2018 has allowed the said petition directing the respondent authorities to refund the entire amount with 9% interest to the petitioner but the said order was not complied with by the respondents, therefore, the petitioner filed contempt petition wherein it has been informed by the respondents that the amount of Rs. 3,12,594/- has already been paid on 04.01.2019 and amount to the tune of Rs. 2,00,554/- towards 9% interest has been paid on 30.09.2021. 3. On the other hand learned counsel for the State would submit that the entire amount has already been paid to the petitioner and nothing remains to be paid to him. 4. This proposition of accepting the amount with interest has not been disputed by the petitioner. No justifiable reasons has been assigned by the petitioner for claiming amount of Rs. 60,805/- and no averments has been made by the petitioner to justify the amount as stated by him. 5. In absence of any foundation to justify the claim of Rs. 60,805/- by the petitioner, no writ can be issued to the respondents at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika