Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129231 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16571 of 2025 Petitioner :- Narottam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suneel Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer;
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent No.2 Additional Collector/Additional District Magistrate Fiancé and Revenue District Azamgarh to decide the Case No. 1099 of 2003 (Narottam Versus Goan Sabha and others), Under Section 28 of Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1901 expeditiously preferably within a catapulted period as may be prescribed by this Hon'ble court."
2. In paragraph no. 5 of the writ petition it has been stated that petitioner had filed a case for correction of map under Section 28 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. In paragraph no. 6 it has been stated that the said suit was rejected, thereafter, petitioner had filed a revision. In paragraph no. 9 it has been stated that the said revision has also been dismissed.
3. The case of petitioner is that Case No. 1099 of 2003 filed by him was decided and revision against the said order has also been dismissed and both the orders are not under challenge before this Court, while petitioner has sought a mandamus seeking direction upon the respondent no. 2 to decide the Case No. 1099 of 2003 expeditiously.
4. Writ petition is highly misconceived and same stands dismissed with cost of Rs. 5000/-. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Shekhar Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad