S. No. 89 Suppl. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 212/2025 CM(421/2025) GHULAM AHMAD DAR …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Sajid Ahmad Bhat, Advocate Vs SRINAGAR MUNCIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 05.02.2025 1. By reference to the Ward Officer concerned who otherwise is under an obligation to monitor the construction activity strictly as per the approved plan granted in favour of the petitioner vide Order No. SMC 2022/981 dated 07.12.2022, the petitioner is aiming to say that that the Ward Officer is actuated with mala fide and harassing the petitioner. However, the Ward Officer by name has not been so impleaded, as such, this Court finds no good reason to show indulgence on the given state of pleadings of the writ petition as well as array of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh one so as to implead Ward Officer Pandach, Srinagar Municipal Corporation by name as well as by his post. 3. Writ petition is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one granted. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 05.02.2025 AAMIR Amir Rashid Sofi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 07.02.2025 15:30