RATTAN DEVELOPERS AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31024/2024 · 2025-07-10
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61558 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61558 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 286(1) CRM-M-31024-2024 Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 Rattan Developers and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Sharma, AAG, Punjab. **** MANISHA BATRA
, J. (ORAL)
1. As per office report, notice issued to respondent No.2 has been received back with the report that he refused to receive the same. However, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition.
2. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
(MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE July 10, 2025 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.07.11 09.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document