Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61554 (PAT)

Kailu Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/2966/2025 · 2025-10-10

Satyavrat Verma

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2966 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-351 Year-2022 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1. Kailu Mandal S/O Late Sattan Mandal R/o Village- Kabaiya Basa Ward 01 P.S- Alamnagar District - Madhepura 2. The State Bihar and another R/o Village-Kabaiya Basa Ward 01 P.S- Alamnagar District-Madhepura ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Manoj Rishideo S/O Late Kartik Rishideo R/O Vill.- Budhma Tola Aoray, Ward no. 10, P.S.- Udakishunganj, Dist.- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 10-10-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special P.P. Mr. Binay Krishna. 2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 25.04.2025 in B.P. No. 951/2025, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Madhepura, in connection with Uda- Kishunganj P.S. Case No.351/2022, registered under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2966 of 2025(3) dt.10-10-2025 2/2 Act as well as Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act. 3. This is the second attempt of the appellant to seek regular bail. It is next submitted that appellant had earlier moved this court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.4886/2023 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 20.09.2024 passed by the then coordinate Bench. 4. After going through the order dated 20.09.2024 in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.4886/2023, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 5. The appeal of the petitioner stands rejected. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T