SHRI RAJU S/O GANESH BHANDARI v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
WP/104478/2025 · 2025-12-10
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61543 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61543 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17864 WP No. 104478 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 104478 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
SHRI. RAJU S/O. GANESH BHANDARI AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: CHARGE MEN, R/O: VENKATAPUR, NEAR LAKSHMI VENKATESH TEMPLE, POST: SHIRALLI, TQ: BHATAKAL, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA 581 320. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR N.W.K.S.R. T.C CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBLI.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT N W K S R T C, UTTARA KANNADA DIVISION, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA 581401.
3.
THE DEPOT MANAGER.
N W K S R T C, BHATKAL DEPOT UTTARA KANNADA …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.PRASHANT HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY ORDER OR DIRECTIONS TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, UTTARA KANNADA DIVISION, SIRSI/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN SANKHE.
VA KA RA SA. UK SHISTU NO.354(2025)/863 DATED 26/04/2025 FOR
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17864 WP No. 104478 of 2025
THE UNDER KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REGULATION OF 18 OF 1971 (CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY). VIDE ANNEXURE-E. AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order of suspension.
2. There is no subsisting order of suspension as the same has been revoked by the respondent. Consequently, the petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of.
3. If any grievance still survives in relation to the suspension, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
AC CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 147