Phul Pari Devi @ Manoj Das Maa v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./49641/2025 · 2025-08-11
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61541 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61541 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49641 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2025 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur ======================================================
1. Phul Pari Devi @ Manoj Das Maa W/O Ram Gati Das R/O Village - Vishunpur Birauli Khurd, P.S.- Pusa, Dist.- Samastipur.
2. Ram Gati Das S/O Mohan Das R/O Village - Vishunpur Birauli Khurd, P.S.- Pusa, Dist.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. Deepak Kumar S/O Lagandev Das R/O Village - Rasulpur Turki, P.O-Osai, P.S- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application on behalf of the petitioner no. 1.
3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with regard to petitioner no. 1 and now this application is restricted to petitioner no. 2 only.
4. The petitioner no. 02 seeks bail in connection with Pusa P.S. Case No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 80, 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS.
5. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of killing the deceased.
6. The petitioner no. 02 is in custody since
6.5.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49641 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner no. 02.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed with regard to petitioner no. 02.
9. Let the petitioner no. 02, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samastipur/concerned Court below in connection with Pusa P.S. Case No. 9 of 2025.
10. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with regard to petitioner no. 1 and allowed with regard to petitioner no. 02.
11. It is made clear that if the trial of the petitioner no. 1 is delayed by the prosecution then she may renew her prayer for bail.
Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U