INTYAZ KHAN SON OF SHRI UMMED KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2090/2025 · 2025-02-10
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6154 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6154 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2090/2025 Intyaz Khan Son Of Shri Ummed Khan, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Kayamkhani Kotdi, Ward No. 11, Dundlod, Police Station Mukundgarh, District Jhunjhunu At Present Suspended From The Post Of ASI And Posted At Headquarter, Police Line, Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3. Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur.
4. Superintendent Of Police, District Sikar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Sunita Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 10/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the prolong suspension of the petitioner, and has relied upon the order dated 08.10.2024 passed in S.B. CWP No.17178/2022 titled as Vikram Singh Rathore vs State of Rajasthan & Anr. and the
judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs. Union of India(UOI) & Ors. reported in 2015(7) SCC 291 more particularly para 21 of the said judgment. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the consensus drawn inter-se the parties,
(2 of 2) [CW-2090/2025] respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner for revocation of suspension within a period of 60 days, from the date of passing of this order, by passing a speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law. In light of above said, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J HEENA/129