Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111799 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18486 of 2024 Applicant :- Bablu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Kumar Sahu,Ashish Pandey,Brijesh Kumar Yadav,Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 212 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 I.P.C., Police Station- Pailani, District- Banda, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that this is the second bail application of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.12.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8519 of 2023. It is further submitted that the applicant was appointed as Bank Mitra and allegation has been made against him that he instead of depositing the amount of certain customers, misappropriated the same. It is further submitted that there are 11 witnesses but till date, not a single witness was examined before the trial court. It is also submitted that the order dated 21.08.2023 passed in WRIT - C No. 17335 of 2023 which is annexed with the supplementary affidavit dated 21.07.2024 shows that the entire amount of customers has already been paid by the bank. It is further submitted that applicant has no criminal antecedents to his credit. The applicant is languishing in jail since 15.08.2022. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Bablu involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 KS Digitally signed by :- KISHAN SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad