YOGESH DUA v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA
CRR/4494/2025 · 2025-11-25
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61515 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61515 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
Sl. 342 25.11.2025 Court No.29 Sc CRR 4494 OF 2025
--------
Re : An Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)
In the matter of: Yogesh Dua
… Petitioner
Mr. Vikram Chaudhuri (VC) Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee.
… For the Petitioner Mr. Arijit Chakraborty Mr. Debsoumya Basak.
…For E.D.
This application has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 30th July, 2025 passed by learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court, Calcutta in M.L Case No.03/2025 arising out of ECIR No. KLZO 1/06/2025. By the impugned order, the Court below held that at the stage of pre-cognizance hearing the petitioner is not entitled to get the entire set of annexure or documents relied upon by the prosecution. During the course of hearing Mr. Debsoumya Basak, learned Counsel for the E.D. submits, on instruction, that his client is ready and willing to give a legible copy of all the documents mentioned in Annexure-B to the accused person within a short date. Having heard learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner and the opposite party and also considering the fair submission made on
2 behalf of the E.D., the instant application being CRR 4494 of 2025 is hereby disposed of with the direction that the E.D. shall supply legible copy of all the documents mentioned in Annexure-B to the petitioner/accused person within ten days from this date. This order is made without adjudicating real controversy between the parties and therefore shall not be taken as a precedent.
(Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)