Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61514 (PNJ)

ALL HARYANA PETROLEUM DEALERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/15008/2024 · 2025-04-24

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (263) All Haryana Petroleum Dealers Association State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of mandamus, upon the respondents, to remove the road over of large vehicles, like tanker trucks and em road connecting Sectors 76 and 77, Southern Peripheral Road to NH Gurugram. 2. appearance have already been removed by the authorities concerned, and therefore, the sole grievance of the 15008-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH All Haryana Petroleum Dealers Association Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Rashi Shahrawat, Advocate Mr. Deepak Jaglan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of mandamus, upon the respondents, to remove the road over-head barriers, that blocks the approach of large vehicles, like tanker trucks and em road connecting Sectors 76 and 77, Southern Peripheral Road to NH Upon notice, learned counsel for the respondent No.3, has caused before this Court, and submits that the road over have already been removed by the authorities concerned, and therefore, the sole grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15008-2024 Date of Decision : 24.04.2025 All Haryana Petroleum Dealers Association …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate and Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate Through the instant petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of mandamus, upon the head barriers, that blocks the approach of large vehicles, like tanker trucks and emergency vehicles, on the approach road connecting Sectors 76 and 77, Southern Peripheral Road to NH Upon notice, learned counsel for the respondent No.3, has caused and submits that the road over-head barriers, have already been removed by the authorities concerned, and therefore, the been redressed. Through the instant petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of mandamus, upon the head barriers, that blocks the approach ergency vehicles, on the approach road connecting Sectors 76 and 77, Southern Peripheral Road to NH-8, Upon notice, learned counsel for the respondent No.3, has caused head barriers, have already been removed by the authorities concerned, and therefore, the MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.25 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-15008 3. respondent No.3, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant petition, and the same is hereby 4. April 24, 2025 Manpreet 15008-2024 In view of the statement suffered by the learned counsel for the spondent No.3, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant petition, and the same is hereby closed. Consequently, the instant petition is , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 In view of the statement suffered by the learned counsel for the spondent No.3, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In view of the statement suffered by the learned counsel for the spondent No.3, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.25 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment