Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61507 (KAR)

SHRI MAHENDRA S/O MAHALING KADAM v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

WP/102609/2025 · 2025-10-30

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14741 WP No. 102609 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102609 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI MAHENDRA S/O MAHALING KADAM, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.SHIRAGAON, TQ.CHIKODI, DIST.BELAGAVI 591201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.L. SANDRIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM GHATAPRABHA RIGHT IRRIGATION NI., DIVISION NO.4, CHIKODI, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591201. 2. THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM GHATAPRABHA RIGHT IRRIGATION NI., DIVISION NO. 4, KERUR, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591201. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION MAJOR, IRRIGATION PROJECTS, BELAGAVI SUVARNA, SOUDHA, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI- 591201. 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HIDKAL DAM, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHETHAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, SRI. RAMESH CHIGARI, AGA FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE LEGAL NOTICE DATED. 29-11-2024 SENT BY PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14741 WP No. 102609 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel Sri. Chetan Munnoli representing the Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited submits that the utilisation of the land of the petitioner has allegedly taken place by constructing a canal and the process of acquisition has now commenced and the proposal has been submitted to the State. It is for the State to take action in accordance with law. 3. In the light of the said circumstance, without entering into the merit of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with a direction to the State to take expeditious steps with regard to the proposal sent by the Karnataka Meeravari Nigam, which has now initiated the process of acquisition of the lands of the petitioner which had stood utilised long ago. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14741 WP No. 102609 of 2025 4. The action shall be taken within six months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, if not earlier. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RSH/CT-GTB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 117