Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61504 (CHH)

Shankar Lal Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/1985/2017 · 2025-12-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60764 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Judge- Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Sunil Otwani, Senior Advocate WPS No. 1985 of 2017 Shankar Lal Pandey S/o Late Shri Motilal Pandey, Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Helper, Working As Amin, In The Office Of Sub- Divisional Officer, Janjgir Canal Division, Sub- Division No. 1, Water Resources Department, Janjgir Chhattisgarh R/o Quarter No. A- 1/ 06, Old Irrigation Colony, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Engineer In Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer, Minimata Hasdeo Bango Project, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Canal Deputy Collector, Hasdeo Basin, Water Resources Department, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer, Janjgir Canal Division, Sub- Division No. 1, Water Resources Department, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shankar Lal Pandey, Petitioner in person For Respondents/State : Mr. Ajit Singh, GA AWARD (Passed on 13.12.2025) ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.12.19 11:24:14 +0530 2 1. The present petition has been filed seeking direction towards the respondents to absorb the services of the petitioner on the post of Amin. 2. Today, both the parties filed compromise application stating that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Hence both the parties compromised the dispute amicably and as such nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 3. The contesting parties to this petition have amicably settled/compromised the dispute. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties. 4. A copy of this docket/compromise arrived at by the parties be made part of this record. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Sunil Otwani) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur ashu