Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61493 (PNJ)

SATNAM SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/28805/2025 · 2025-05-26

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28805-2025 DECIDED ON: 26.05.2025 SATNAM SINGH .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Prateek Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Gorav Kashyap, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S for quashing of FIR No. 149 dated 30.10.2007, registered under Sections 447,511,506,148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Machhiwara, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1), along with all subsequent proceedings, including the declaration of the petitioner as a Proclaimed Offender, in view of the compromise dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) entered into between the parties, especially since all other accused have been acquitted of the charges; Anuradha 2025.05.26 22:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28805-2025 2 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant case with liberty to file afresh with better particulars and challenge the proceedings separately qua the quashing of the FIR on the basis of the compromise and the order vide which the petitioner was declared proclaimed offender. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty afore-said. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 26.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.26 22:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document