IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.969 of 2021 Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Raj Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Sheetal Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner states that on account of subsequent developments, whereby petitioner has expired, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Interim order, if any, stand vacated. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 01, 2025 (Sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?