Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61487 (PNJ)

MANJIT KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/14795/2025 · 2025-05-22

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-14795-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CWP-14795-2025 Date of Decision :22.05.2025 Manjit Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioner is that she is entitled for the grant of benefit of pay scale as envisaged under the rules governing the service, which was also part of the advertisement but the petitioner is not being granted the said benefit, which is causing prejudice to her. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said question of law has already been decided by this Court while passing order in CWP-15896-2023 titled as Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and another decided on 13.09.2024. 3. Notie of motion. 4. Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior DAG, Punjab accepts notice of behalf of the respondents and submits that in case, any representation is received from the petitioner for the grant of benefi of pay scale as envisaged under the rules governing the service, the same will be decided by the AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.23 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14795-2025 2 respondents in the light of the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma (supra) by passing appropriate speaking order within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of such representaiton and in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted otherwise, due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed, which order will be conveyed to the petitioner for her information and necessary action. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for respondents, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file appropriate representation. 6 Ordered accordingly. May 22, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.23 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document