Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110547-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16514 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajat Nigam Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. In pith and substance, the grievance of the petitioner is that the representation dated 03.01.2025 (Annexure No. 5) pending before the second respondent may be decided expeditiously. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel very fairly states that in case the aforementioned representation is still pending for consideration, the same will be heard and decided expeditiously by the Authority concerned. 4. In the facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the second respondent to decide the aforementioned representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before him but certainly after affording opportunity to all stakeholders in the matter. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 A.K.Srivastava Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad