Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61457 (ALL)

DHEERAJ SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P.

CRLR/6037/2023 · 2025-05-22

Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88647 Court No. - 90 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6037 of 2023 Revisionist :- Dheeraj Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Jitendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjeev Kumar Singh Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Balwant Pratap Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondent and perused the record. 2. Present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist with a prayer to set-aside the judgment and order dated 09.11.2023, passed by the Court of Additional District, Court No.1, Prayagraj, Criminal Appeal No.201 of 2023(Dheeraj Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and others), arising out of Case Crime No.376 of 2019, under sections 420, 467, 468, IPC, Police Station Karnalganj, District Allahabad. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail during pendency of trial before the court below. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist has already enlarged on bail and cause of action no more survives in the matter and prays that present revision may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Balwant Pratap Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondent jointly states that they have no objection, in case the present revision is dismissed as infructuous. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Order Date :- 23.5.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad