CHAYA TUKARAM BHOI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
WP/1669/2020 · 2025-04-09
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61453 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61453 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
m1-appln-1996-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1996 OF 2020 AMIR S/O MOHAMMAD SHAIKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER … WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1047 OF 2020 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1048 OF 2020 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1669 OF 2020 …
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 08 MAY 2025
ORDER : . Today, the office has produced the matter in chamber pointing out the typographical error in the judgment dated 09.04.2025 passed in Criminal Application No.1996 of 2020 with companion matters. It is pointed out that in the said judgment words “Criminal Application No.1047 of 2020” have been wrongly mentioned. It should be “Criminal Writ Petition No.1047 of 2020”
2. Taking into consideration the same, in the said judgment wherever the words “Criminal Application No.1047 of 2020” are mentioned, the same be replaced with “Criminal Writ Petition No.1047 of 2020”. [1] 2025:BHC-AUG:13202-DB
m1-appln-1996-2020.odt
3. Necessary corrections be carried out in the said judgment and corrected judgment be uploaded. Corrected writ be issued to the parties concerned. Copies issued, if any, be deemed to have been corrected accordingly.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]