Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61451 (CHH)

PRAVIN KUMAR AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13833/2025 · 2025-12-10

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60278 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13833 of 2025 1 - Pravin Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Ashok Agrawal Aged About 40 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B) Govt. Primary School Gidhpuri Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instructions, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4- Collector Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. CJK Rao, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kulesh Sahu, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 11/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already preferred representation before the State Level Rationalization Committee raising his grievance. He would further submit that this petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue representation already pending before the State Level Committee as well as SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.12 10:45:33 +0530 2 to file afresh representation before the Committee and a direction may kindly be issued to the respondent authorities to decide the same. 2. Prayer made by the petitioner is just and proper. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. 4. The State Level Rationalization Committee is directed to decide appeal already preferred by the petitioner as well as the fresh representation submitted by the petitioner within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh