Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61446 (PNJ)

AMARDEEP KHURANA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/28630/2025 · 2025-05-23

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-28630-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CRM-M-28630-2025 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 Amardeep Khurana ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL Present : Mr. J. S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.0421 dated 25.10.2021, under Sections 279, 337 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Line Sirsa, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) and affidavits dated 24.04.2025 (Annexure P-3 & P-4). 2. Notice of motion. 3. Ms. Ankita Ahuja, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 4. Mr. G. S. Aulakh, Advocate, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 to 4 and filed power of attorney and confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that respondent No.2 to 4 have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question. 5. Learned State counsel has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise. He further states that there are no ANIL KUMARcriminal antecedents qua the petitioner. 2025.05.27 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28630-2025 2 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record. 7. In that view of the matter, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre- ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 8. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.0421 dated 25.10.2021, under Sections 279, 337 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lin Sirsa, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner shall stand quashed. 9. Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise. (H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE 23.05.2025 anil Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No ANIL KUMAR 2025.05.27 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document