1 2025:CGHC:60351 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2592 of 2023 1 - Dr. S.S. Agrawal S/o Late Shrikrishna Agrawal Aged About 64 Years Presently Posted And Working As Principal, Rajiv Gandhi Government P.G. College, Ambikapur, District- Surguja Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Higher Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur P.S. Rakhi, Atal Nagar District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Under Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Mantralaya Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner, Directorate Of Higher Education Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Additional Director, Higher Education, Regional Office Surguja Division Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh. 5 - Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 6 - Dr. Kiran Gajpal, Principal, Dudhari Bajranj Mahila Snatkottar Mahavidyalaya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Order on Board 11/12/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to call the entire records pertaining to this case. 10.2 Hon'ble court may kindly further be pleased to quash the arbitrary and erratic impugned order dated 06/12/2022 & 01/03/2023. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly issue direction against Res. No 1 and take him to task for going against work ethics and service rules of state. 10.4 Kindly provide any other relief(s) which it deems fit along with cost of the petition in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat