Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6144 (GAU)

RIAZ UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/2475/2015 · 2025-03-03

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010012442015 2025:GAU-AS:2209 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2475/2015 RIAZ UDDIN S/O HAJI ABDUR ROUF, VILL. BARGOOL, P.O. GULCHERRA, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION ELE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KARIMGANJ P.O. P.S. and DIST- KARIMGANJ ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL SELECTION COMMITTEE KARIMGANJ REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECY. CUM DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KARIMGANJ DIST- KARIMGANJ ASSAM 5:ABDUS SUBHAN S/O HAJI ABDUN NOOR VILL. and P.O. GULCHERRA DIST- KARIMGANJ ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MRA R BHUYAN, MR.M A I HUSSAIN Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAMR4, DR.B AHMED(R-5),MR.S R BORUAH(R-5),MR.A B T HAQUE(R-5),SC, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION(R1,2,3),MR.D CHAKRABORTY(R-5),MR.D CHAKRABARTY(R-5) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 04.03.2025 Heard Mr. N. Z. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. N. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel for the Elementary Education Department and Mr. A. B. T. Haque, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of enactment of The Assam Repealing Act, 2020, whereby, the Assam Madrassa Education Provincialization Act, 1995 and the Assam Madrass Education (Provincialization of Services of Employees and Re-organization of Madrassa Educational Institutions Act, 2018 had been repealed, this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition stands closed being infructuous. However, it is needless to say that if the petitioner is having any fresh cause of action, he will be at liberty to approach this Court once again. JUDGE Comparing Assistant