Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:60869
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13879 of 2025
1. Parghaniya Ram Sahu S/o Radheshyam Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 22, Ghasidas Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
2. Shankar Ram Yadav S/o Sahasram Yadav Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Shyampur, Tahsil Chhuikhadan, Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh.
--- Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health Engineering, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Superintending Engineer Public Health Engineering, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
3. Executive Engineer Public Health Engineering, Division Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
4. Executive Engineer Public Health Engineering, Division Khairagarh, Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 13890 of 2025 Ramkumar Chandrakar S/o Late Ramprasad Chandrakar Aged About 63 Years R/o Village - Laxmanpur, Bhathapara, Tahsil- Chhuikhadan, District- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.16 11:04:08 +0530
2 Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Water Resource Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
2. Superintending Engineer Water Resource Department, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)
3. Executive Engineer Water Resource Department, Division- Chhuikhadan, District- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 15/12/2025
1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others vs. State of Chhattisgarh
[WPS
No.
3870
of
2021
(decided
on 30.09.2022).
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge santosh