- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5965-DB WA No. 100517 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO.100517 OF 2023 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI ABDULREHAMAN S/O. NABISAB PYATI, (SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS) SMT. HASINA D/O. ABDUL REHMAN BEPARI, AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORKS, 2. MUBARAK S/O. ABDUL REHMAN PYATI, AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, 3. SMT. HAMEDA W/O. ABDUL REHMAN BEPARI, AGE. 67 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORKS, 4. DAWOOD S/O. ABDUL REHMAN PYATI, AGE. 34 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, 5. SMT. TARNAM W/O. RIYAZ SHAIKH, AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORKS, 6. HAZARATH BILAL S/O. ABDUL REHMAN PYATI, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5965-DB WA No. 100517 of 2023 ALL ARE R/O. JANTA PLOT, HANSABHAVI, TQ. HIREKERUR, DIST. HAVERI-581109. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI A.S.R. NAMAZI, SRI AHMED ALI RAHIMAN SHAH, ADVOCATES) AND: THE MANAGEMENT OF N.W.K.R.T.C., HAVERI DIVISION, R/BY ITS DIVISION CONTROLLER, HAVERI DIVISION, HAVERI-581110. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08/06/2023 PASSED IN W.P.NO.106077/2015 (L- KSRTC) BY THE SINGLE JUDGE AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE DISMISSED ORDER PASSED BY THE LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI, IN KID NO.125/2013, DATED 27/12/2014 AND FURTHER SET ASIDE THE DISMISSAL ORDER FROM SERVICE DATED 30/12/2012 BY THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, EQUITY AND CONSCIENCE AND ETC.,. THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5965-DB WA No. 100517 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA) The present appeal is filed by the writ petitioner under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, calling in question the order dated 08.06.2023, passed in W.P No.106077/2015. The said writ petition is filed challenging the award dated 27.12.2014, passed in KID No.125/2013, by the Labour Court, Hubli. 2. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of the Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Karmika Sangha, Bangalore1, has held that no appeal is maintainable against the order passed by learned Single Judge, wherein, an award passed by the Labour Court was called in question. 3. The view rendered in the case of Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd3, has also been followed by an another Co-ordinate Bench judgment of this Court in the case 1 2022 (3) AKR 609 - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5965-DB WA No. 100517 of 2023 of Sri. C.C. Subbegowda and Another Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Hassan Division, Hassan2. 4. In view of the aforementioned, the above writ appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 5. In view of disposal of writ appeal, pending I.A’s, if any, does not survive for consideration and are accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE PMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 2 W.A No.1615/2023 dated 19.03.2024