MS NAVNIRMAN DEVELPMENT CONSULTANTS THROUGH MRS VARSHA ATYUL DHAWALE v. ZILLA PARISHAD AURANGABAD THROUGH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CA/1261/2025 · 2025-01-31
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61417 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61417 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 11439.24WP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 978 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1261 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11439 OF 2024 M/S. NAVNIRMAN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS VERSUS ZILLA PARISHAD, AURANGABAD ... Advocate for the applicant : Mr.A.S.Deshpande Advocate for Respondent : Mr.P.R.Nangare …
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 31.01.2025 P.C. : 1] The present application is filed to recall the
order dated 14.10.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.11439/2024. 2] This Court passed the order on 14.10.2024 in Writ Petition No.11439/2024 considering the submission of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner that the order dated 29.08.2024 passed by the District Judge-4, Aurangabad at Exh.58 was the impugned order in the Writ Petition. 3] Today it is pointed out that the order impugned in the writ petition is dated 05.09.2024 in Regular Darkhast 2025:BHC-AUG:2815
2 11439.24WP No.198/2010 along with the order dated 29.08.2024 at Exh.58. 4] Considering the same, the order dated 14.10.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.11439 of 2024 stands recalled and the Writ Petition is restored to it’s original stage. 5] In absence of any order being passed by this Court, the trial Court would be at liberty to proceed further. 6] Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC