Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61394 (KAR)

MANJUNATH C SHIVAYYANAVAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/101999/2024 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13092 WP No. 101999 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 101999 OF 2024 (S-REG) BETWEEN: MANJUNATH C. SHIVAYYANAVAR AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. ASSISTANT TEACHER IN JAYADEVITAI HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, FORT, DHARWAD. R/O MUGAD RAILWAY STATION, MUGAD, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD-580007. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.G. CHIKKANARAGUND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION & LITERACY, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALURU-560001. 2. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, COLLEGE ROAD, DHARWAD-580008. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, DHARWAD DISTRICT, DHARWAD-580008. 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, DHARWAD CITY, DHARWAD-580008. 5. BHARATIYA VIDYA KENDRA (R), FORT, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD-580008, R/BY ITS PRESIDENT. 6. BHARATIYA VIDYA KENDRA (R), FORT, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD-580008, R/BY ITS SECRETARY. 7. JAYADEVITAI HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, FORT , DHARWAD-580008. REP ITS HEAD MASTER. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13092 WP No. 101999 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15-12-2021 AND 31-03- 2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND L FOR APPROVAL/REGULARIZATION OF HIS SERVICE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS WP COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM,CT:VP LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 41