Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61394 (ALL)

RAMSWAROOP v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/16766/2025 · 2025-05-29

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93246 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16766 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramswaroop Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Sadar, Maharajganj/ respondent no. 3 to decide the Case No. 11283 of 2021, Computerized Case No. T-202205470111283 (Gaon Sabha Versus Lal Bahadur) and Case No. 11284 of 2022, Computerized Case No. T- 202205470111284 (Gaon Sabha Versus Gauri Shanker) under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before him expeditiously or within the period fixed by this Hon'ble Court for the same, so that justice may be done." 3. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner is not party to the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, the proceedings cannot be expedited at his behest. 4. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. Since the proceedings are pending, it is expected that the same shall be decided in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad