Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6139 (RAJ)

DR.GHANSHYAM SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI R.N. SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2854/2020 · 2025-09-08

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2854/2020 1. Dr.ghanshyam Sharma S/o Late Shri R.N. Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, Cast- Brahmin, R/o- 193, Vivekanand Na- gar, Kota, Raj. (Associate Professor, Dept. Of Pure And Ap- plied Physics, University Of Kota, Kota). 2. Dr.om Prakash Rishi S/o Late Shri Ram Naraian Rishi, Aged About 48 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o- B-701, Om Urban Heights, Behind Truck Union, Ajay Ahuja Nagar, Kota, Raj. (Associate Professor, Dept. Of Computer Science And In- formatics, University Of Kota, Kota). 3. Dr.prakash Chandra Gupta S/o Late Shri Gagan Prasad Gupta, Aged About 49 Years, Cast- Vaisya, R/o- 587, Sec- tor B, R. K. Puram, Kota. (Associate Professor, Dept. Of Computer Sciences And Informatics, University Of Kota, Kota). 4. Dr.anukriti Sharma W/o Shri Virendra Choudhary, D/o J.p.n. Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, Cast- Brahmin, R/o- B-107, Ashirwad Gokul, Behind Truck Union, Ajay Ahuja Nagar, Kota, Raj. (Associate Professor, Dept. Of Commerce And Management, University Of Kota, Kota). 5. Dr.bhawani Singh S/o Shri Chhaju Ram, Aged About 45 Years, B/c- Ahir, R/o- 360, Vivekanand Nagar, Kota, Raj. (Associate Professor, Dept. Of Pure And Applied Chemistry, University Of Kota, Kota). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, (Raj.) 2. University Of Kota, Through The Registrar, Near Kabir Circle, MBS Marg, Swami Vivekanand Nagar, Kota, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anita Aggarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA [2025:RJ-JP:35756] (2 of 2) [CW-2854/2020] Order 08/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. In view of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /89