Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61379 (CHH)

VISHWANATH BAISHWADE v. SHRI HIMSHIKHAR GUPTA

CONT/1748/2025 · 2025-12-14

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60911 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1748 of 2025 1 - Vishwanath Baishwade S/o Ram Kumar Baishwade Aged About 36 Years Working As Jail Warder, District Jail, Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Kishore Mishra S/o Santosh Mishra Aged About 32 Years Working As Jail Warder, District Jail, Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chandrashekhar Ratnakar S/o Ramnihore Ratnakar Aged About 34 Years Working As Jail Warder, Central Jail, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dhanjay Kumar Laskar S/o Suderlal Laskar Aged About 30 Years Working As Jail Warder, District Jail, Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Binod Kumar Nirala S/o Deveram Nirala Aged About 27 Years Working As Jail Warder, Sub Jail Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Himshikhar Gupta Secretary, Home Department Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Himanshu Gupta Director General, Jail And Corrective Service Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Raj Rishi Rai Superintendent Of Jail, Central Jail Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sudhir Thakur Jail Superintendent, District Jail Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Leekesh Kumar, Advocate. For Resp. 1 : Mr. Siddhant Das, Advocate. For Resp. 2 to 4 : Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 15/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the order dated 25.08.2025 (Annexure C/1) passed by this Court in WPS No. 1702/2023 has been complied with. 2. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the respondent that they have already complied with the order passed by this Court, ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.15 17:11:03 +0530 2 nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage, therefore, the Contempt proceeding initiated against the respondent is closed. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of. d/- Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun