Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61377 (CHH)

HONENDRA JANGDE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

ACQA/63/2024 · 2025-12-10

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60249-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 63 of 2024 • Honendra Jangde S/o Late Sonsai Jangde, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Jarhagaon, Post Mungeli, P.S. Jarhagaon, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh, ... Appellant versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Jarhagaon, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh, 2. Shastri Alias Manna Miri S/o Jagannath Miri Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Jarhagaon Post Mungeli P.S. Jarhagaon, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, 3. Dinesh Miri S/o Baijnath, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Jarhagaon Post Mungeli P.S. Jarhagaon, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, 4. Baiju Miri S/o Shivdayal Miri, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Village Jarhagaon Post Mungeli P.S. Jarhagaon, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, 5. Dhanesh Miri S/o Baijnath, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Jarhagaon Post Mungeli P.S. Jarhagaon, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, 6. Mahesh Alias Bedaiya Miri, S/o Shastri Alias Manna Miri, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Jarhagaon Post Mungeli P.S. Jarhagaon, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None For Respondents : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal, Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Division Bench Order on Board 11.12.2025 PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2025.12.11 17:55:35 +0530 2 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the parties even when the case is called thrice for hearing. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Prakash