Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61369 (ALL)

BHUPENDRA PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/7126/2025 · 2025-05-20

Ajit Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86035 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7126 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhupendra Pratap Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganesh Mani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner who is a complainant seeks writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to get the government accommodation vacated from respondent No.4. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner being busy buddy and complainant does not have any locus to maintain a petition. 4. Upon a pointed query being made as to what stake of petitioner is involved being an employee of the respondent establishment, counsel for petitioner could not demonstrate from the pleadings that petitioner has any stake as employee of the establishment. 5. In the considered view of the Court, no third party petition at the instance of the complainant can be entertained, inasmuch as no public interest litigation is entertainable in service matters. 6. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter with the liberty to the petitioner to explore possibility of raising his grievance before appropriate forum, if so advised. 7. Subject to aforesaid liberty the petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad