Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129755 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17430 of 2025 Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant-accused Deepak Kumar for the offence punishable under Sections 3(5), 61(2), 318(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of B.N.S. and under Section 66-D I.T. Act in Case Crime No.08 of 2025, Police Station-Cyber Crime, District Muzaffar Nagar. 2. Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned advocate appeared for the applicant and submits that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no independent witness for the alleged offence. The accused applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. Nothing recovered from the possession of accused. It is further submitted that the accused applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since March, 2025. As such, he prays that the accused/applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. This court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 5. The perusal of the record prima facie reveals that the F.I.R. has been lodged against eight named accused wherein the present accused is one of them. The F.I.R. has been registered by the police party when certain incriminating articles have been recovered from the accused. The investigation is continuing. The role assigned to the accused applicant is that he provides the bank account for committing of cyber fraud. The incriminating article, which has been recovered from the accused applicant is stated to be of his friend, Rahul. The accused is in jail since March, 2025. There is no other incriminating material available with the Investigating Officer, which led the accused in jail for long. The statement of accused has already been recorded. There is only a confessional statement of accused. 6. Hence, without touching merit of the case and considering the entire gamut of facts, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Shivangi (Avnish Saxena, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad