Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103522 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2042 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pallavi Mishra,Vivek Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The petitioner has preferred an application for correction of records/restoration registered as Case No.88 of 2024 (Sanjay v. Ram Singh) under Section 12 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act before the competent authority, but the same has not been decided till date. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the said restoration application may be decided within stipulated time period as the delay is coming in the way of full enjoyment of the rights of the petitioner over the property. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the restoration application is liable to be decided by the competent authority within a reasonable period of time. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No.2- Consolidation Officer, Hathras is directed to decide the restoration application registered as Case No.88 of 2024 (Sanjay v. Ram Singh) under Section 12 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order after hearing all the parties. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad