1 2025:CGHC:60499 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6476 of 2025 Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Village Kushfar Through Its President Heeralal Singh, S/o Shri Devsharan Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Kushfar, Tahsil Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food Civil Supply Corporation, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The District Director, Food And Civil Supplies Corporation, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - The Collector, Office Of Collectorate, Balrampur (Food Branch), District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - The Food Inspector, Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - Govt. Fair Price Shop Kameshwar Nagar, Gram Panchayat Kameshwar Nagar, Tahsil Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2025.12.16 11:12:49 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State-Respondents : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 12.12.2025 1. Learned counsel for State raises an objection with regard to the maintainability of this writ petition stating that petitioner is having an efficacious remedy of appeal under Clause 18 of the Control Order, 2016. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this writ petition is filed on the ground that show cause notice before passing of the order is issued to salesman and not to the President and writ petition is filed by President claiming that order is passed in violation of principles of natural justice. 3. At this stage learned counsel for State submits that perusal of order impugned Annexure P-1 dated 06.11.2025 would show that order is passed by competent authority pursuant to order passed by this Court in WPC No. 6370 of 2024 dated 26.09.2024 and, therefore, the order is passed after giving proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the documents enclosed along with this writ petition. 5. The order of writ petition is placed before this Court by counsel for petitioner perusal of which would show that the writ petition was filed by the President of Society and this writ petition is also filed by President. Once the President was aware of proceedings initiated against the Sewa 3 Sahkari Samiti and he participated before competent authority i.e. Sub Divisional Officer pursuant to order passed by this Court, submission of counsel for petitioner that the order passed is in violation of principles of natural justice is not sustainable. 6. For the foregoing discussion and the fact that under Clause 18 of the Control Order, 2016 there is a remedy of appeal available to the petitioner under the law, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition, accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail other alternate remedy available to him under the law. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) alfiza JUDGE