IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222 CWP-14037-2017 (O&M) Decided on : 07.05.2025 KRISHAN LAL ..PETITIONER Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, HISAR AND ANR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. Lajpat Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present petition has already been answered by this Court while passing order in CWP-12480-2017 titled as ‘Meenu Devi versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hisar and another, alongwith other connected cases, decided on 03.04.2025, hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of in the same terms and conditions as held in Meenu Devi's case (supra). 2. Learned counsel for the respondents-State on the other hand, has not been able to dispute the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner recorded herein above. RIYA 2025.05.12 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14037-2017 (O&M) -2- 3. Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner recorded herein above, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as held in Meenu Devi's case (supra). 4. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 07.05.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.05.12 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document