Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61341 (KAR)

SRI ABHISEK DALABANJAN S/O NARAYANSAB DALABANJAN v. SMT. SAHANA BALABANJAN W/O ABHISHEK DALABANJAN

RPFC/100043/2025 · 2025-11-12

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15449 RPFC No. 100043 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100043 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. ABHISEK DALABANJAN S/O. NARAYANSA DALABANJAN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, HOUSE NO. 1, SRI SAI SHIVAJYOTHINAGAR, HOSAPETE-HARIHARA ROAD, NEAR HAGARIBOMMNAHALLI, WELCOME BOARD, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, VIJAYNAGAR-583 212. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. SIDDESWARA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. BASAVARAJ R. Y., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SAHANA DALABANJAN W/O. ABHISHEK DALABANJAN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD WORK, RESIDENT/CARE OF RAMAKRISHNA CHOUDHARI, LIG 200, 10TH CROSS, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AYUSH G. BHAT, ADVOCATE AND SRI. G.A. BHAT, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO A) CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN CRL.MISC.NO.294/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI AT HUBBALLI. B) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI AT HUBBALLI IN CRL.MISC.NO.294/2024 THEREBY ALLOWING THIS REVESION PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.11.13 10:24:06 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15449 RPFC No. 100043 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the revision petition, which reads as under: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL “The undersigned advocate for the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above said petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice.” 2. In view of the memo, the revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE RKM, CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 28