Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61339 (BOM)

VINOD GAJANAN SIDDHBHATTI v. KADU SURAYBHAN PARDHI DIED IS PROP LRS PURUSHOTTAM KADU PARDHI AND OTHERS

CA/8418/2024 · 2025-07-03

Shri Rohit W Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

909-ca-8418-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8418 OF 2024 IN WP/975/2024 Vinod Gajanan Siddhbhatti VERSUS Kadu Suraybhan Pardhi Died Is Prop Lrs Purushottam Kadu Pardhi And Others ... Mr. M. B. Sandanshiv h/f Mr. S. S. Nade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. D. Raje, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. V. B. Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1a to 1c Mr. V. B. Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 In W.p. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 975 OF 2024 … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : 3rd JULY 2025 PER COURT :- 1. The learned Counsel for respondent nos.1-A to 1C has produced death certificate of deceased respondent no.1 for perusal of the Court. As per the said death certificate respondent no.1 has expired on 12.01.2024. The present application for bringing his legal representatives on record is filed on 06.08.2024. 2. leave is granted to the petitioner to amend the application to incorporate prayer for condonation of delay. Amendment be carried out forthwith. Narwade 2025:BHC-AUG:17270 909-ca-8418-2024 -2- 3. Having regard to the statement in paragraph 2 of the application that the petitioner was not aware about demise of respondent no.1, delay caused in filing application for bringing legal representatives of respondent no.1 is condoned. 4. Petitioner is permitted to bring names of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 on record. 5. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. 6. Place the Writ Petition on 31.07.2025. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] Narwade