1 2025:CGHC:60286 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13787 of 2025 1. Chamru Ram Yadav S/o Budhwar Yadav Aged About 63 Years R/o Bazarpara, Village And Post- Sakar, Tahsil Akaltara, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 2. Vijay Kumar Shukla S/o Laqt. Umashankar Shukla Aged About 63 Years R/o Near Lions Club Chowk, Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Purshottam Dwivedi S/o S. R. Dwivedi Aged About 63 Years R/o Gurunanank Residency, Gaurav Path, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Superintending Engineer Public Works Department Bilapsur Circle, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Executive Engineer P W D Champa Division, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. Joint Director Treasury, Account And Pension, Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 13816 of 2025 Shyam Kumar Yadav S/o Munnu Das Yadav Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No. 01, Yadav Mohalla, Village Barpali, Tahsil- Sariya, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.12 14:42:55 +0530 2 ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Superintending Engineer Public Works Department Bilapsur Circle, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Executive Engineer P W D, Sarangarh, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Joint Director Treasury, Account And Pension, District : Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.L. Rajak, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 11/12/2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022). 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh