1 2025:CGHC:60462 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6267 of 2025 1 - Shri Ganga Maiyya Machhua Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Lakhasar (Reg. No. 368), Through Its President, Krishna Kumar Kenwat, S/o Shri Predeshi, Aged About 51 Years, Village Lakhasar, Block Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Fisheries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate, Fisheries Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Deputy Director Fisheries Department, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Lakhasar, Block Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Rishab Bisen, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 12 /12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- 2 “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the order dated 28.08.2025 (Annrexure P/1). 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to allot Ramai Talab for pisciculture in favour of petitioner society. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct respondent authorities to reserve only one pond for the purpose of nistari i.e. Pandey Talab. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is having the alternate efficacious remedy to file a revision before the Commissioner. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other remedy available under the law. He however, submits that directions may be issued to return back the certified copy of the documents enclosed along with the writ petition. 4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under the law. Registry is directed to return back the certified copies of the documents enclosed along with the writ petition after retaining photocopies of the same. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY