HARJINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/5438/2025 · 2025-05-23
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61311 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61311 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5438-2025 -1-
139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5438-2025 Date of Decision: 23.05.2025 Harjinder Singh and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr.Prabhat Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to the respondents No.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners at the behest of the private respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major and are living in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondents No.4 and 5. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 13.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only.
4. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State.
5. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived.
SHARMILA DEVI 2025.05.23 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC
CRWP-5438-2025 -2-
6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship.
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 23.05.2025 JUDGE sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2025.05.23 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC