Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61307 (KAR)

SRI. ANANT VEERBHADRAPPA DAIVADHNYA v. SRI. SIDDAPPA KALLAPPA ZATTI,

RSA/6001/2010 · 2025-11-12

C M Joshi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15477 RSA No. 6001 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.6001 OF 2010 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. 1A. SRI. ANANT VEERBHADRAPPA DAIVADHNYA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS, SRI. SURYAKANT SIDRAMAPPA DAIVADHNYA AGE: MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. YAMKANMARDI, TQ. HUKKERI-591245. 1B. SRI. VISHWANATH SIDRAMAPPA DAIVADNYA AGE: MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. YAMKANMARADI, TQ. HUKKERI-591245. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. N.D. GUNDE AND SRI. SUNIL DESAI, ADVOCATES) AND. 1. SRI. SIDDAPPA KALLAPPA ZATTI AGE: MAJOR, OCC. PENSIONER, R/O. YAMKANMARDI, TQ. HUKKERI-591245. 2. THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, YAMKANMARADI, TQ. HUKKERI-591245. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIJAY M. MALALI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; R2-NOTICE SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED FAST TRACK AND ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, HUKKERI, IN R.A.NO.13/2007 DATED 27.07.2010 THEREBY DISMISSING THE APPPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANTS AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.02.2007 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) SANKESHWAR, IN O.S.NO.03/2006 AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL WITH COSTS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.11.13 10:24:08 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15477 RSA No. 6001 of 2010 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER. THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) None appears for the appellants. It is noticed that on previous occasion also none appeared for the appellants. Today also none appeared for the appellants in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Hence, it appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE YAN CT.PA LIST NO.. 1 SL NO.. 40