1 2025:CGHC:60512 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6496 of 2025 Kashish Gowani W/o Sunil Gowani Aged About 38 Years At Dr. Matreja Street, Tekchand Bhawan, Phool Chowk, Nayapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Tehsildar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Maal Jamadaar Tehsil Office Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Jana Small Finance Bank Through Authorized Person, At Fairway Ground, First Floor, Survey No. 10/1, 11/2 And 12/2 B, Off Domlur Koramangala, Inner Ring Road, Next To Egl Business Park, Challanghatta, Banglore, 560071, Karnataka. Branch Office At Krishna Complex, Opp. Auribindo Netralaya, Main Road, Sadar Bazar, Raipur, 492001, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Mrs. Asha Mundra W/o Radheshyam Mundra R/o House No. 507, Suryoday Apartment, Opp. Patidar Bhawan, Khamtarai, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - M/s Shree Gurukripa Merchant Through Its Proprietor Sandeep Kumar Gowani, Situated Ag Gol Bazar, Opp. Hanumna Mandir, M.G. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sandeep Kumar Gowani S/o Rajkumar Gowani Dr. Matreja Street, Tekchand Bhawan, Phool Chowk, Nayapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2025.12.12 14:22:39 +0530 2 7 - Mrs. Kanak Gowani W/o Sandeep Kumar Gowani Dr. Matreja Street, Tekchand Bhawan, Phool Chowk, Nayapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr.Pranjal Shukla, Panel lawyer Hon’ble Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 12.12.2025 1. On objection being raised by counsel for State that in view of grievances raised in this writ petition and further from the copy of application as filed along with covering memo it appears that the proceedings filed by petitioner is pending before DRT and, therefore, this writ petition will not be maintainable. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the objection raised by learned State counsel he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue the application for urgent hearing already filed before DRT, Jabalpur. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. C.C. Today sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge alfiza