2025:UHC:5876 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 773 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Arjun Arora, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. The present applicant ‘Govind Kumar’ S/o Rishipal is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 19.01.2025 bearing FIR No. 31 of 2025 P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant is implicated for the offence punishable under Section 80(2) of BNS, 2023. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and he was married with the deceased in the year of 2021 and from this marriage two male child were born. He submits that the applicant and the deceased were living happily, however, on the date of the incident the applicant was on duty in UPCL district Udham Singh Nagar where he is serving. He further submits that now the chargesheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of the custodial interrogation of the present applicant and the applicant have no previous criminal history. 6. On the other side, learned A.G.A. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht have not disputed this fact that now the chargesheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of the custodial interrogation of the present applicant, however, he submits that after collecting all credible evidences and the link evidences the chargesheet has been filed and he also submits that as per the CDR report the location of the applicant was found at the place of occurrence. 7. On the other side, learned counsel for the 2025:UHC:5876 complainant also oppose the bail application and submits that at the time of the incident the applicant’s location was found at the place of occurrence and the applicant since marriage was always harassing the deceased for the demand of dowry and the applicant should not be granted bail. 8. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the chargesheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of the custodial interrogation of the present applicant and furthermore the applicant married with the deceased in the year of 2021 and from this marriage two male child were born, who are at present living with the parents of the present applicant, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant ‘Govind Kumar’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. 11. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant shall join the trial court proceeding on each and every date without seeking any unnecessary adjournment, failing which, the Trial Court may proceed to take action against the applicant including for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 08.07.2025 PR 2025:UHC:5876