[2025:RJ-JP:27141] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 951/2025 Narayan Bareth S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 64 Years, R/o B-47, Ashok Vihar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur ----Appellant Versus 1. Kamlesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Prahlad Meena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 7 Khijuri Ps, Rawanjana Doongar, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan (Driver Of The Mahindra Jeep Old Number Rj-26-P-0598 / New Number Rj-14-T-7697) 2. Bhupendra Singh Rajawat S/o Shri Karan Singh, R/o 31/318, Bambala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, (Registered Of The Mahindra Jeep Old Number Rj-26-P- 0598 / New Number Rj-14-T-7697) 3. Babulal Jat S/o Shri Nanuram Jat, R/o Jethnawali, Chomu, District Jaipur (Registered Owner Of The Mahindra Jeep Old Number Rj-26-P-0598 / New Number Rj-14-T-7697) 4. Shakeel Mohammad Care Of Babulal Jat, R/o Chomu, District Jaipur (Registered Owner Of The Mahindra Jeep Old Number Rj-26-P-0598 / New Number Rj-14-T-7697) 5. United India General Insurance Company Limited, Through Manager, Office M.i. Road, Jaipur (Insurance Company Of The Mahindra Jeep Number Rj-26-P-0598 / Policy Validity 06.06.2004 To 05.06.2005, Cover Note No. 062946) 6. Sultan S/o Jodharam, R/o Gram Post Pithalpur Ajeetgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan (Driver Of Indica Car Number Rj- 14-T-3959) 7. Gopalram Kumawat, R/o A-40, Gayatri Nagar, 4 Number Dispensary, Sodala Jaipur (Owner Of Indica Car Number Rj-14-T-3959) 8. National Insurance Company Limited, Through Regional Manager, Regional Office 24-A Transport Nagar, Delhi Road, Jaipur (Validity Period 13.03.2005 To 12.03.2006) (Insurance Company Indica Car Number Rj-14-T-3959) ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:27141] (2 of 2) [CMA-951/2025] For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/07/2025 No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant even in the second round. Earlier also on 17.04.2025 and 18.07.2025, when the case was listed before the Court for hearing, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, the present civil misc. appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /209