1 2025:CGHC:60197-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3749 of 2025 Bhaskar Prasad Tripathi S/o Bhagwat Prasad Tripathi Aged About 56 Years R/o House No. 1469, Vivekanand Nagar, Phase-II, Mopka, P/s Sarkanda, Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. Superintendent of Police District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. SHO Police Station- Sarkanda, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Ajit Shukla S/o Shukla R/o Agroha Housing Society, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/o Late Ishwari Singh R/o M I G - 14, R. P. Nagar, Phase-1, Kosabadi, Korba, Chhattisgarh, At Present Address- Quarter No. D-31, Vasudev Bhawan, Shivam City, Rajkishore Nagar, Police Station Sarkanda, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.12.11 18:51:22 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 11.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. Rupesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “1. Quash FIR No. 1618 of 2025 dated 22.11.2025, registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur, under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC against the petitioner; 2. Quash all consequential and related proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR; 3. Pass any other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, the charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned trial Court. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the same. 3 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum, if so advised. 6. Certified copies of the documents annexed to the petition, if any, may be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan